Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 97
Filter
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 37(1): 2349957, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735867

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Postpartum hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity around the globe. The novel low-suction vacuum hemorrhage device (VHD) provides an alternative treatment option for cases of postpartum hemorrhage when first-line uterotonic agents fail. This systematic review aims to review current data evaluating the overall efficacy and safety of VHDs in treating postpartum hemorrhage. METHODS: We searched CINAHL Ultimate, Academic Search Premier, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE with Full Text, and PubMed and reference lists of retrieved studies for eligible studies that included outcomes of effectiveness, efficacy, or safety. Two independent reviewers used Covidence.org to screen Titles and Abstracts for 69 studies of which six were included in the analysis. Secondary outcomes measured across studies included time to bleeding control, total device deployment time, and adverse effects. RESULTS: Six nonrandomized trials (N = 1018 participants) included studies conducted in Indonesia, the United States, Switzerland, and Canada. The VHDs were found to have 90% effectiveness in achieving bleeding control across the studies. For most patients, this was achieved in <5 min and required a total device deployment time of 3 h. Reported adverse events were not considered life-threatening, including endometritis in 11 patients and red blood cell transfusions in 38% of patients. CONCLUSION: VHDs have the potential to be used as a rapidly effective means for mechanical intervention of postpartum hemorrhage. The efficacy and safety of VHDs must be further studied at the randomized controlled trial level to determine their clinical usage.


Subject(s)
Postpartum Hemorrhage , Humans , Postpartum Hemorrhage/therapy , Female , Pregnancy
2.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 2024 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38489051

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Zuranolone, an oral version of allopregnanolone and neurosteroid, is a novel drug for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and postpartum depression (PPD). AIM: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of zuranolone in the treatment of MDD and PPD. METHOD: A systematic search was conducted using EBSCOhost to simultaneously search Academic Search Premier, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL Ultimate, and MEDLINE with Full Text. Two independent reviewers screened the articles and completed a full-text review using Covidence. The quality of each study was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). A meta-analysis was then conducted using Review Manager (RevMan v5.4) software. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 127 results, with 6 articles fitting our inclusion and exclusion criteria. All 6 studies, comprising 1707 participants, had an overall low risk of bias. There was a significant decrease in HAM-D scores for MDD at 15 days versus placebo (MD - 2.40, 95% CI - 3.07 to - 1.63; p < .001). When pooling data for PDD, there was an overall significant decrease in HAM-D scores at 15 days versus placebo (MD - 4.06, 95% CI - 4.25 to - 3.87; p < .001). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that zuranolone can improve symptoms of PPD at 15 days; however, results were not clinically significant for MDD. Future research is needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of zuranolone in PPD and the treatment efficacy in MDD.

3.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 41(2): 158-166, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36945136

ABSTRACT

Palliative care (PC) longitudinal curricula are increasingly being recognized as important in Undergraduate Medical Education (UME). They are however, not yet commonplace, and where they do exist may be implemented without a systematic, prospective approach to curriculum evaluation. This paper describes an implementation of a new longitudinal curriculum at the Perelman School of Medicine (PSOM) at the University of Pennsylvania. We used the Context Input Process Product (CIPP) model, a holistic evaluation model, to assess the local environment, design the curriculum, guide the improvement process, and evaluate outcomes. Comprehensive models such as CIPP provide a more robust approach to curriculum evaluation than outcomes-only models and may be of use to other programs who are implementing new curricula or improving upon existing programs.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Medicine , Students, Medical , Humans , Palliative Care , Curriculum
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877049

ABSTRACT

Introduction: During the initial COVID-19 pandemic peak, Stamford Hospital implemented a home oxygen program (HOP) to create a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary outpatient initiative without sacrificing a safe discharge. Primary care physicians monitored program participants, whose only indication for remaining admitted was an oxygen requirement. We retrospectively examined participant co-morbidities and outcomes, including death and readmission rates to evaluate HOP safety. Methods: A retrospective analysis of program participants discharged between April 2020-Janurary 2021 was performed. Variables included demographics, oxygen requirement, days enrolled in the HOP, and major comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes (DM), hypertension (HTN), obesity, chronic kidney disease, malignancies and underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Results: Among the 138 HOP participants, ages ranged from 23 to 96 (Mean 65.5), with 47.1% female and 52.9% male. The most represented ethnicity included White (48.6%), Hispanic (29.7%), and Black (15.2%). Patients' average time in the HOP was 19 days, requiring an average of 1.7 L/min of home oxygen. Thirteen patients (9.4%) were readmitted to the hospital with 2.9% secondary to worsening COVID-19 hypoxia, but no deaths occurred at home. A significant relationship was found between age and highest home oxygen need. Patients with COPD, HTN, and DM had significantly higher oxygen requirements (P-value <0.05). Conclusion: Increasing age, underlying COPD, HTN, and DM were associated with higher oxygen requirements in participants. Given limited availability of hospital beds, and no occurrences of death at home, Stamford Hospital HOP safely helped provide care for sicker patients and enhanced resource allocation.

5.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 11(7): e5123, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37469476

ABSTRACT

Submental fat (SMF) contributes to an aged or overweight appearance that may negatively impact an individual's psychological well-being. Deoxycholic acid (ATX-101) is an injectable formulation of deoxycholic acid approved to treat SMF. The Condition of Submental Fullness and Treatment Outcomes Registry (CONTOUR) Australia study was designed to understand treatment patterns and outcomes with ATX-101 in Australia. Methods: CONTOUR Australia was a phase 4, prospective, observational, multicenter registry that enrolled adults considering treatment for SMF reduction. Results: The registry enrolled 86 patients from six sites. Significant changes from baseline through the end of treatment indicated improvement in mild to moderate fullness associated with SMF on the Clinician-Reported SMF Rating Scale and the Patient-Reported SMF Rating Scale, improvement in SMF-associated psychological impact after treatment on the Patient-Reported SMF Impact Scale, no overall worsening in skin laxity based on Submental Skin Laxity Grade, and increased patient satisfaction with the face/chin on the Subject Self-Rating Scale after receiving treatment. Adverse events were all mild and mostly related to the injection site (ie, bruising and swelling). Conclusion: CONTOUR Australia observed clinically meaningful and significant outcomes and further supports ATX-101 as a well-tolerated and effective treatment for SMF reduction.

6.
Data Brief ; 48: 109287, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37287691

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created a variety of symptoms from mild to acute in the general population. Additional disease burden was experienced in high-risk populations, such as older adults, people with disabilities or overweight, those from racial and ethnic minority groups, and patients with cancer, chronic kidney, lung or liver disease, or diabetes. Although it is well-known that SARS-CoV-2 mostly affects the respiratory tract, studies have revealed the presence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in those patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The best protection against infection is through receipt of the COVID-19 vaccine, which is associated with a low incidence of adverse events. However, there is limited research on the lesser-known side effects experienced following receipt of the COVID-19 vaccination, amongst healthy and special needs populations. This study investigated the association between the COVID-19 vaccination and, when it occurred, infection, and resulting gastrointestinal (GI) symptomology, focusing on both the general population and on those previously diagnosed with GI disorders, Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Through a short, anonymous survey, 215 participants were assessed for acute onset of GI issues and/or worsening of pre-existing GI issues following the receipt of one or more COVID-19 vaccine doses and following contraction of COVID-19 itself, when applicable. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4, and prior to study initiation, the study protocol was reviewed and approved as exempt by the Stamford Hospital's Institutional Review Board of record. Data analysis included reporting of demographic variables as well as descriptive statistics regarding side effects experienced after receipt of the COVID-19 vaccine, as well as after contracting COVID-19, if it occurred. To assess for statistically significant differences between the groups, ANOVA was conducted for each survey item. Reporting of results consisted of the mean and standard deviation within each of the groups, and an omnibus p-value less than 0.05 (p <0.05) was considered statistically significant. For the purposes of this report, a greater than 0.50 response difference between highest and lowest mean value will be presented. In the event of a statistically significant omnibus p-value, the Scheffe test was used as the post-hoc procedure. The database created through this research demonstrates the prevalence of post-COVID-19 vaccination side effects and can serve as preliminary data for gaining a better understanding of how both general and populations with a higher disease burden are being affected by the COVID-19 vaccine, booster doses, and incident COVID-19 infection in vaccinated individuals.

7.
Am J Med Sci ; 366(3): 227-235, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37331512

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: When feasible, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the definitive intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, cardiac tissue reperfusion is not always achievable after opening the infarct-related artery. Studies have investigated associating factors and scoring for the "no-reflow" phenomenon. This paper aims to systematically establish the predictive values of total ischemic time and patient age as factors of coronary no-reflow in patients undergoing primary PCI. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using EBSCOhost, including CINAHL Complete, Academic Search Premier, MEDLINE with Full Text, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Search results were compiled utilizing Zotero reference manager and exported to Covidence.org for screening, selection, and data extraction by two independent reviewers. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies was used to evaluate the eight selected studies. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 367 articles, with eight meeting the inclusion criteria with a total of 7060 participants. Our systematic review demonstrated that for patients older than 60 years, the odds of the no-reflow phenomenon increased 1.53- 2.53 times. Additionally, patients with increased total ischemic time had 1.147- 4.655 times the odds of no-reflow incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients older than 60 years with a total ischemic time >4-6 h are at higher risk of PCI failure due to the no-reflow phenomenon. Therefore, new guidelines and more research to prevent and treat this physiologic occurrence are essential to improve coronary reperfusion after primary PCI.


Subject(s)
No-Reflow Phenomenon , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Coronary Angiography , No-Reflow Phenomenon/etiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications
8.
SAGE Open Med ; 11: 20503121231176636, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37255627

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Median arcuate ligament syndrome is a complex disorder potentially caused by variation in the position of the median arcuate ligament. Symptomology involves chronic abdominal pain, nausea, and malnourishment. Pain management modalities and short-term outcomes for patients undergoing operative surgery for median arcuate ligament syndrome have yet to be fully evaluated. Our hospital implemented a pain management consultation program in 2017 focused on perioperative pain management. The objective of this study is to assess if the introduction of a pain management consultation program concurrent with median arcuate ligament syndrome surgery impacts patient outcomes and post-operative pain management strategies in these patients. Methods: De-identified data was collected retrospectively from our hospital's electronic medical records system, identifying median arcuate ligament syndrome patients and using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes from September 2017 to August 2021. Patients were grouped into the "consultation" cohort if they had scheduled and attended a pre-operative pain consultation. Pre-operative and discharge medications, pain scores, and demographics were collected to evaluate if the initiative impacted outcomes. Results: Median arcuate ligament syndrome patients who had a pre-operative pain management consultation had higher rates of pre-operative opioid (35.5%; p = 0.01) and non-opioid use (60.7%; p < 0.001). Patients without a pre-operative consultation that did not use opioids pre-operatively were more likely to be discharged on one or more opioids. Differences were also found for psychiatric medication at discharge (p < 0.001) with patients receiving pain consultation indicating higher percentages of use. Conclusion: Special consideration on prescribing pain medication should be part of discharge planning for median arcuate ligament syndrome patients. Addition of a pain management consultation can aid in these decisions.

9.
Data Brief ; 46: 108891, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36687155

ABSTRACT

While surgical outcomes of prophylactic salpingectomy as an ovarian cancer risk reducing measure at the time of hysterectomy for benign indications has already been studied, data has traditionally been extrapolated to surgery for prolapse repair. A retrospective chart review was performed from medical records of patients who had undergone a sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Variables collected included operation duration, length of hospital stay, readmission within 31 days, estimated blood loss (EBL), number and size of incisions, as well as narcotic use during hospitalization. Additional procedures performed at the time of operation including vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy, transobturator sling, anterior or posterior colporrhaphy, cystoscopy, and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy were collected as potential confounding variables. In addition, data to allow examination of pathology results of all fallopian tubes was collected to determine the proportion of pre-malignant and malignant pathology results. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 8. Two cohorts were created: (1) Patients who underwent adnexal surgery (bilateral salpingectomy or salpingoopherectomy) at time of the sacrocolpopexy and (2) Patients who underwent a sacrocolpopexy without adnexal surgery. Comparisons were performed with chi-square analysis for discrete variables and group t-tests for continuous level data. Narcotics administered during the immediate post-operative period until discharge was collected for each patient and converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME) via multiplying the administered dose by the CDC established evidence-based conversion factor. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) as well as logistic regression was used to control for confounding variables, including the additional procedures patients had during their operation. An omnibus p-value of 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance for all tests. Due to the exploratory nature of this analysis, there were no corrections applied for multiple comparisons. This data can be used as a basis for researchers to build upon when assessing ovarian cancer primary prevention strategies and associated treatment modalities.

10.
JAMA ; 329(2): 119-120, 2023 01 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36477254

ABSTRACT

This Viewpoint argues that reversing or restricting the use of race and ethnicity in academic admission policies could also threaten the diversity of medical schools, both directly by restricting race consciousness in medical school admission practices and indirectly by reducing the overall number of minoritized undergraduate students attending US colleges and universities who could apply to medical school.


Subject(s)
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion , Education, Medical , School Admission Criteria , Schools, Medical , Humans , Racial Groups , Students , Students, Medical , Ethnicity , Universities , Cultural Diversity
11.
J Healthc Leadersh ; 14: 191-201, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36444313

ABSTRACT

Stamford Hospital (SH) is a 305 bed Level II Trauma center located in Fairfield County, the epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Connecticut. The COVID-19 pandemic was a fast paced, rapidly evolving crisis, presenting our leadership team with unique challenges related to resource availability, patient care, and staff safety. The existing Hospital Incident Command System (HICS) was activated in March 2020 to coordinate our operational emergency management planning, response, and recovery capability for this unplanned event. Although HICS lays the groundwork for hospital preparations and protocol implementation, it is not designed to withstand prolonged crisis circumstances. Given the conditions that the COVID-19 pandemic presented, the possibility for future waves became an impending reality, prompting the need for a long-term solution. To establish guidelines that promoted balance between necessary preparations in the case of additional surges of the pandemic and concurrent resumption then maintenance of routine hospital operations, the SH COVID-19 Playbook was created. The Playbook, presented here, is arranged in accordance with the evidence-based 4 S's (Space, Staff, Systems, and Stuff) strategic critical care planning framework, to address surge capacity management within our hospital's four main patient care areas and additional supportive services. Through feedback from frontline caregivers and leaders within SH, the Playbook captures our experience, best practices, and insight acquired during the first wave of the pandemic. Established with the intentions of equipping leadership and staff globally, guidelines are presented to aid in the navigation of future pandemic surges and successfully care for COVID-19 patients, ensure staff safety, allow for normal services to operate, and provide optimal communication and support for the community, patients, and staff.

12.
South Med J ; 115(9): 712-716, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36055660

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been an unexpected crisis that continues to challenge the medical community at large. Healthcare environments have been forced to change dramatically, including for medical residents, who are vital members of the innovative emergency response teams. Articles have previously been published on the effects of crises on the well-being of healthcare practitioners; however, there is a paucity of literature targeting medical residents' experiences and general wellness during devastating events. The objective of our study aimed at understanding the emotional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on residents' stress, academics, and support systems. METHODS: An anonymous, voluntary Likert scale questionnaire was sent via SurveyMonkey to Internal Medicine and Family Medicine residents in July 2020. Questions focused on residents' mood; stress levels; sense of support; and academics before, during, and immediately after the first surge of COVID-19 at our hospital between March 13 and June 15, 2020. RESULTS: Residents felt sad, stressed, and overworked during the first wave, as opposed to feelings of neutrality and happiness before and immediately after. Levels of concern for personal and loved ones' safety were significantly increased during and after our first wave. The impact on educational training was rated as neutral. Residents noted that institutional support could be improved by the provision of wellness activities and sponsored social events. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight on resident well-being during the initial months of the pandemic and identifies areas that could be improved. Our results demonstrated that the pandemic affected many aspects of residents' well-being and education, and the lessons learned can help guide healthcare institutions when implementing wellness activities for trainees during subsequent crises.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Internal Medicine , Pandemics
13.
HERD ; 15(3): 171-192, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35389291

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A comparative study was undertaken to survey nurses working in an acute care nursing unit before and after moving to a new hospital to investigate the impact of a nursing unit designed utilizing Planetree build criteria. BACKGROUND: The physical and emotional demands of frontline practitioners is a serious concern for patient safety and staff retention as the environmental design of nursing units can influence human errors from fatigue and interruption. METHOD: A pre-move survey was conducted with acute care nurses in a conventional design nursing unit who were moving to a new facility. After the move to the new hospital design, the same survey was readministered to obtain comparative performance information. Qualitative responses were analyzed for triangulation with survey responses. Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) and Press Ganey scores were collected over a 5-year period. RESULTS: There were statistically significant improvements for most of the survey questions, especially for work efficiency and productivity, the design of the patient room and of support spaces, the information systems, and the environmental conditions. There were statistically significant improvements in the HCHAPS and Press Ganey survey questions. CONCLUSIONS: The postoccupancy survey showed statistically significant improvements in most of the concerns highlighted in the pre-move survey and significant improvements in the workflow and overall satisfaction of nurses. Press Ganey results revealed all but five domains fell in the significantly improved category.


Subject(s)
Hospital Design and Construction , Patient Satisfaction , Hospitals , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workflow
14.
Neurohospitalist ; 12(2): 241-248, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35419152

ABSTRACT

Objective: Compare the differences in health outcomes and patient satisfaction between a neurohospitalist model of care and a community-based neurologists model at a single community-based teaching hospital among in-patients diagnosed with a cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Methods: Data was collected from the Stamford Hospital's electronic medical records system. An assessment of patient health outcomes and satisfaction scores was conducted, comparing both discrete and continuous variables between the two time periods. An omnibus P-value of 0.05 (P < 0.05) was considered statistically significant. Results: The sample consisted of 341 patients between the two periods, pre-period n = 168 (49.3%) post-period n = 173 (50.7%). Door to lab and door to tPA times decreased significantly between pre- and post-periods (P = 0.003 and P = 0.002, respectively) as did the number of MRIs (P < 0.001). In addition, statistically significant increases were found between pre-period and post-period percentages, all increasing over time: stroke education (P < 0.001), discharged on anticoagulant medication (P < 0.001), and discharged on anti-thrombolytic medication (P = 0.019). Patient satisfaction scores demonstrated mean gain across both periods for five of six items. Two items "Doctor's Concern of my Questions/Worries" and "Skill of Doctors" demonstrated statistical significance (P = 0.020 and P = 0.029, respectively). Conclusions: The introduction of a neurohospitalist service at a community-based teaching hospital improved patient health outcomes on time to intervention, stroke education, discharge medications as well as patient satisfaction. Therefore, it may be beneficial for hospitals to implement a neurohospitalist model of care for their patients presenting with CVA.

15.
Data Brief ; 40: 107814, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35018296

ABSTRACT

A comprehensive and validated questionnaire modified from previous epidemics [1,2] was distributed to frontline HCWs at high risk for COVID-19 at our community-based teaching hospital, the epicenter of the pandemic in our state. Results of the full analysis were previously reported [3] indicating that our nursing staff were more likely to report feelings of stress, emotional exhaustion and fatigue compared to physicians and other health professionals. We highlight the pandemic's specific impact on nurses' emotions, perceived stressors and effective coping mechanisms used during the first surge of COVID-19.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...